It’s funny how much a financial slave is discredited. Not to mention a Financial Mistress, who is compared to a sex worker. And by the way, although not irrelevant I want to make clear that prostitutes have all my respect, the work they do is commendable and nothing to do with ‘easy life’, they work hard.
But today’s topic is neither prostitution nor Financial Domination, but financial slavery in which there are different types of subject.
Is that a financial slave, blackmaild or moneyslave is less submissive than another one who does not surrender anything but his body a little while when he feels like and the rest of the time dramatizes of surrender skits on social networks?
There is a false belief that a moneyslave pay for some services, and nothing further from reality. He meets the rules of his Mistress and submits even in an economy way. I do not act according to what a slave provide me, but as I want to do at all times and the slave obeys further that he provides cash besides abide my whims. I neither attract them with tricks nor pursue anyone, and whoever comes to me does it knowing and being constantly aware of my demands. Things that are also his fetishes.
I won’t go into the value of a Dominatrix or another because they all have something, but if you compare the balls of someone who undergoes a consensual blackmail, for example, with a submissive you only see online… I’m sorry, but the first one shows and the second one is a sticky distraction.